Re: Miscellaneous (was Scientists Complete Map...; Intelligent Design 2/3; this is interesting)

From: billwald@juno.com
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 12:24:33 EDT

  • Next message: Bertvan@aol.com: "Miscellaneous"

    >In everyday life people make their decisions (and even civil law cases
    are
    >decided) `on the balance of probabilities'. It would therefore be
    sufficient
    >for the Designer to only supply sufficient evidence that `on the balance
    of
    >probabilities' there is a Designer.

    This is true, also in criminal law, but it is more likely evidence of
    sloppy use - multiple definations - of words than a similarity between
    the subjects of the words. 400 years ago there wasn't any natural,
    theological, or legal, or philosophical difference between the phrases
    "law of God, law of nature, civil law." Civil laws were enacted by the
    "divine right of kings" and God imposed the "laws of nature" upon the
    universe and anyone whose observations of natural relationships seemed to
    contridict the Bible was declared a heretic.

    For example, SEJ also wrote:

    >First, even if this were true, it would not be an argument against
    design.
    >Science has had to work hard to find the laws hidden deep within nature.

    >But no one says the laws can't exist because they are hard to find.
    Indeed,
    >that there are laws hidden deep within nature is part of the overall
    >argument from design!
     
    He is equating civil law passed by local governments to the physical
    relationships which appear to "govern" this universe - using one word
    for two dissimilar functions. In the bad old days, stating "Boyle's Law"
    was equivalent to stating "A Godly relationship in the physical universe
    discovered by Boyle." It is important to note that "quantum mechanics" is
    not called "quantum laws." Scientists are no longer out to discover God's
    secret laws but to determine physical relationships.

    It sounds classier to refer to "Boyle's Law" than to Boyle's Best Guess"
    but the phrases are equivalent. Nobel Prizes are won by upsetting
    someone's previous best guess, not by overturning God's Law.

    billwald@juno.com

     

    ________________________________________________________________
    YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
    Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
    Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
    http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 18 2000 - 13:07:43 EDT