Dear Vernon
>Presumably, you will already know that, as a denary object, 37 also has
>interesting properties that are independent of the foregoing.
The word "denary" is not in my dictionary. What does it mean?
>for other reasons, ten appears to be the natural choice of system radix!
Why? A system based on 12 would be much handier <G> for humans, 2 is
logical for computers.
>many are radix-dependent while others are absolute - ie independent of
place, of time, and
> of man's hand!
Have you tried your calculations in base 12? (my math isn't so good)
By the way, if someone in Jesus' time and place had yelled, "Hey, Jesus,"
do you think Joshua ben Joseph would have turned around?
>However, the account is not complete for we have yet to consider the
numerical implications of the >Creator's name as it is rendered in the
Greek, nominative case, of both Septuagint and New >Testament:
Do you consider the Septuagint as inerrant, on a par with the Biblical
autographs?
billwald@juno.com
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 17 2000 - 16:58:46 EDT