Re: Intelligeng Design

From: Cliff Lundberg (cliff@cab.com)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 13:57:01 EDT

  • Next message: billwald@juno.com: "Re: Intelligent Design"

    Susan Brassfield wrote:

    >The belief that the ball of dirt is alive and sentient is a religious belief
    >--I don't disapprove of it as a religious idea, in fact I applaud it. But it's

    >not a *scientific* idea and can't be. It can't be verified. It can only be
    >believed.

    Who or what is sentient? How do you verify sentience in anything?
    What's the laboratory procedure?

    --Cliff Lundberg  ~  San Francisco  ~  cliff@cab.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 05 2000 - 16:05:10 EDT