I'm curious how ID opponents resolve one question. Some people believe
catastrophic events caused the big extinction's, and even the most skeptical
accept such an event probably caused the dinosaur extinction, which would
have included most if not all of the more complex organisms. (In this case
defining complexity as those organisms with the most complex central nervous
systems.) Yet Nature didn't seem to have started again from scratch.
Organisms which appeared at that time had even more complex central nervous
systems than the organisms they replaced. It's as though catastrophes can
wipe out organisms, but it can't wipe out complexity -- or information.
Just curious whether Darwinists have a naturalistic explanation
Bertvan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 17:43:37 EST