Re: Whose 'science'?

From: Pim Van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2000 - 00:10:10 EST

Next message: MikeBGene@aol.com: "Re: Whose 'science'?"

Previous message: Cliff Lundberg: "Re: Whose 'science'?"
Next in thread: MikeBGene@aol.com: "Re: Whose 'science'?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

especially interesting is that Dembski's filter fails to exclude
natural selection as an agent of ID.
COmbine that with the evidence that IC systems can arise naturally and
all we have is an intelligent designer : Nature

Next message: MikeBGene@aol.com: "Re: Whose 'science'?"
Previous message: Cliff Lundberg: "Re: Whose 'science'?"
Next in thread: MikeBGene@aol.com: "Re: Whose 'science'?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 00:10:12 EST