RE: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:47:13 -0700

SJ: My claim was merely that mainstream science already recognises intelligent
design. It makes no difference *in principle* whether the intelligent design
was human, alien, or even time-travellers.

But it does. We can only deal in a very limited fashion with intelligent design by humans. We have no way to deal with other forms of intelligent design.

SJ: However clearly intelligent design before the advent of humans (or hominids)
can only be only either alien, time-travel, or supernatural

SJ: But alien and time-travel hypotheses are less satisfactory than supernatural,
because another hypothesis is required to account for the origin of the aliens
or time-travellers!

Same for the supernatural.

SJ: Moreover, there is no hard evidence for aliens or time-travellers, while there
is hard evidence for the supernatural (eg. Jesus). But of course demonstrating
the latter would take us off-topic.

There is no hard evidence for the supernatural either. Even the historicity of Jesus is doubted by some and there is no evidence of his supernaturality.