RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality?

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:54:26 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality?"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense?"

>CC>That's only IF the designer you claim behvaves in a way that lets his design
>efforts be scientifically tested.

SJ: Chris contradicts himself. He has elsewhere ruled out Intelligent Design (ID)
in advance from science. Now he proposes that ID be "scientifically tested".

Did you read what CC actually said?

Next message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality?"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense?"