You mean Petersen was unable to show evidence that 'data are being ignored because they conflict with current theories' ? Lacking evidence of such increases the evidence of pseudoscience on Petersen's part.
Joseph: <<I follow the data deducing that a significant number of comets arose from ejecta from the sun. Why are those comets in a "metastable state-one that possesses no mechanism for the loss of thermal energy to the surrounding space"? Can't a comet lose thermal energy on the side
that points to deep space because deep space is cold?>>
Aka as radiation. Other mechanisms could be 'outgassing'