> The problem is that there is no way known that would allow a lung to
> evolve, and everything we know about lungs suggests that if it didn't work
> perfectly for even a very short while the animal would die. I think that is
> a problem with evolution.
Why is there so much discussion about such particulars and so little
about
the Cambrian explosion, the most amazing event of all? Is it because
this
event has come to be just synonymous with evolution itself, rather than
being an object of scientific study?
-- Cliff Lundberg ~ San Francisco ~ cliff@noevalley.com