Re: Evolutionary Information 1/2

Ron Chitwood (chitw@flash.net)
Wed, 22 Jul 1998 11:00:36 -0500

observations do NOT support evolution if they are done under controlled
conditions in a lab. i.e.Drosophila. Biochemists are beginning to reject
Darwinian evolutionism as being impossible, according to microbiology (see
Behe's DARWIN'S BLACK BOX). Most field observations are done with a
scientist all ready assuming macroevolution took place, as is taught in
American Educational Institutions. This is a somewhat parochial attitude
since the rest of the world largely is disassociating itself from
Darwinism. There is much, much more that could be said - this thread is
based on that. As you are an active peruser I'm sure you are aware of that.
I am interested in what specific observation you know of that runs counter
to what I have said.

Ye shall know the Truth, and the Truth
shall make you free. John 8:32
Ron Chitwood
chitw@flash.net

----------
From: Pim van Meurs <entheta@eskimo.com>
To: evolution@calvin.edu
Subject: RE: Evolutionary Information 1/2
Date: Wednesday, July 22, 1998 10:05 AM

Please explain how you come to this conclusion ? The observations
supporting evolution are countless and there is no evidence of an
non-natural process.
----------
>>>>But what or whoever surely appears to have worked through a natural
evolutionary process.<<<

Ron: no it doesn't.

----------