I will debate this assertion. If you put the word "scientifically" before
"tested" in the above, you may have a point, though the ID people might
object.
But there is scientific (objective) data, and there is non-scientific
(subjective) data, and there is a third category, private data, which is
objective only to one person. And this private data, I assert, allows one
to test extra-naturalistic (supernaturalistic) hypotheses and
explanations.
I assert that I have so "tested" the "Jesus" explanation and concluded
that rejecting it would be illogical. For me.
Burgy