Pim van Meurs
06-12-97 06:02 PM
To: john.queen.ii @ mail.utexas.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: uhh? why not evolution?
JQ: ---First of all my comments have been destroyed and are no longer
coherent
after your reply. What makes this even worse is tearing into the middle of
I am not sure they were coherent before the reply.
JQ: a sentence. Please do not break my comments apart. I think that my
remarks
over all point deserve to stay in context.
Then read the original posting. I am addressing individual comments in
your posting. Everyone his/her own style.
JQ: Secondly, the fruit fly example is not one of new cells tissue or
organs. In fact, there is no improvement.
Isn't there ? No new legs ? No extra eyes ? How can you even claim that
there is 'no improvement' ?
The fruit fly's have been very usefull for studying ageing. Thier
life span has been increased through selective breeding not mutations.
john w queen ii