Re: uhh? why not evolution?

john queen (john.queen.ii@mail.utexas.edu)
Thu, 12 Jun 97 13:07:50 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Steve Clark: "Re:evolution?and faith and Re:darwin's fish:follow me:read"
Previous message: Russell Stewart: "Re: Racism is Racism: Evolution is NOT"
In reply to: Russell Stewart: "Re: uhh? why not evolution?"
Next in thread: Pim van Meurs: "Re: uhh? why not evolution?"

---Please don't break it up next time. Context means everything. Your replies
only make total sense when you reply at the end. When you reply line by line
you only undermind the overall point of the posting. Summarizing would save
alot of rabbit trails for this forum. If you replied with a main point it would
be easier to reply back. The 'what were talking about' is lost everytime a
posting is resonded to in this manner.

john w queen ii

Next message: Steve Clark: "Re:evolution?and faith and Re:darwin's fish:follow me:read"
Previous message: Russell Stewart: "Re: Racism is Racism: Evolution is NOT"
In reply to: Russell Stewart: "Re: uhh? why not evolution?"
Next in thread: Pim van Meurs: "Re: uhh? why not evolution?"