> Jim,
> In the following response to Randy you reject evolution between fish and
> amphibians without a single mention of any of the fossil evidence. Most
> apologetical books take this approach. There is no discussion of the tail
> similarities, the skull similarities, the existence or lack of gills, etc.
Are amphibians the funnel which all evolution must pass through? If so are
you prepared to show evidence of all life with transitional fossils?
> most difficult thing of all to believe is that God, the Creator of the
> universe, loves me--a sinner.
We are all sinners, my children are but I love them. It is easy for me to
understand how a loving God would love his creation. It is much more
difficult for me at least to understand how a loving God would put mankind
through the Hell that evolutionary mutation must cause. That would be a
legacy of death and horrible torture.
I guess I got a lot more from Jim's post that you did.
=====m-_
`,_` ./.~`-,. "Throughout the hundreds of millions
=,` / 'i '~+=,_ of years the coelacanths have kept
v. . !-. = __. ~\=. the same form and structure. Here is
` ,_. , i`,_'\.- ~e_ one of the great mysteries of evolution"
' -.-,s @@Wi[ ,z,c \\.
.Y/ ,_-8!s/*fi! '',_\,!@m[ Jacques Millot, "The Coelacanth"
_si /i@Wzzz`--,dPV\gW@f
YP -i 'i -. gAY,g@@P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
,!/!5 . iK| !d@/` ~
-=`-(- ',,`! Wf+i dMTf~~Y**f[ ~ Randy Landrum
!-! ! ,./,@b- -WW/b@mW~msm! ~ B.A. Brooks Institute
e..! ,,!A`im/ - .*NW@@@Wf ~ randyl@efn.org
*\ 5-~~,@. = sNWW@@@@Af ~
@XW`. A~ 2+e2@@@@@A~ ~