Re: What if?

From: Don Winterstein <dfwinterstein@msn.com>
Date: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 06:49:20 EST

Sorry; I assumed too much. A paleontologist knows that layers of fossiliferous rocks have suites of fossils that vary according to age of deposition (and other things). The variations result from evolution, because the life forms extant at later periods were in general not the same as those at earlier periods. Hence the consistency of fossil types within a layer of a given age is a consequence of evolution. You won't find the suite of fossils from a young bed in an old bed, for example. Geology dependent on Noah's flood cannot account for this observation.

Experiments compare fossils in beds of the same geologic age. These test the validity of evolution. Finding young fossils in old beds would damage the theory.

Don

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Alexanian, Moorad<mailto:alexanian@uncw.edu>
  To: Don Winterstein<mailto:dfwinterstein@msn.com> ; asa@calvin.edu<mailto:asa@calvin.edu> ; Charles Carrigan<mailto:CCarriga@olivet.edu>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 11:42 AM
  Subject: RE: What if?

  So are all the bodies found in all the cemeteries. What does that have to do with evolution?
   
  Moorad

  ________________________________

  From: Don Winterstein [mailto:dfwinterstein@msn.com]
  Sent: Wed 12/8/2004 1:03 PM
  To: asa@calvin.edu<mailto:asa@calvin.edu>; Alexanian, Moorad; Charles Carrigan
  Subject: Re: What if?

  Moorad wrote:
   
  "Evolution is not an experimental science. Is it? ...."
   
  It is. It allows many predictions. One of the most powerful: Fossils in a bed of a given geologic age will be the same many miles away in a bed of the same age, provided the depositional environment was similar. This prediction has been substantiated innumerable times, and its validity has been widely used for dating sedimentary layers. Also, the kind of prediction Charles Carrigan suggests below has been substantiated many times, usually in somewhat more complicated situations.
   
  Don
   
   

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Charles Carrigan <mailto:CCarriga@olivet.edu<mailto:CCarriga@olivet.edu>>
  To: asa@calvin.edu<mailto:asa@calvin.edu> ; alexanian@uncw.edu<mailto:alexanian@uncw.edu>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 8:05 AM
  Subject: RE: What if?

  Suppose there are three stratigraphic layers A,B, and C, in chronological order, with A the lowest in the pile and the oldest in age. There are no significant breaks in the pile that would suggest long periods of time in between them. Suppose we find a fossil animal in layer A, and a somewhat different one (but yet clearly related) fossil in C. Evolution predicts that there would be an intermediate fossil in layer B, if preserved. That prediction could be tested, could it not?

  of course this is a simplification, and there are all kinds of "what if's" and possible exceptions, but this is a definite real possible test of evolutionary theory. Researchers use this kind of logic all the time when they want to find the newest, latest, and greatest transitional form and publish a paper in Science or Nature.

  best,
  Charles

  <><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><
  Charles W. Carrigan
  Olivet Nazarene University
  Dept. of Geology
  One University Ave.
  Bourbonnais, IL 60914
  PH: (815) 939-5346
  FX: (815) 939-5071

>>> "Alexanian, Moorad" <alexanian@uncw.edu<mailto:alexanian@uncw.edu>> 12/7/2004 4:48:37 PM >>>

  Evolution is not an experimental science. Is it? It uses science in the same way that forensic science uses experimental science. Evolution deals with unique, historical events--just like cosmology. Where is the nonsense in what I have said. It is your comment that is nonsensical!

  Moorad

  ________________________________

  From: Michael Roberts [mailto:michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk]
  Sent: Tue 12/7/2004 4:15 PM
  To: Alexanian, Moorad; Either Carol or John Burgeson; asa@calvin.edu<mailto:asa@calvin.edu>
  Subject: Re: What if?

  Nonsense Moorad
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Alexanian, Moorad" <alexanian@uncw.edu<mailto:alexanian@uncw.edu>>
  To: "Either Carol or John Burgeson" <burgytwo@juno.com<mailto:burgytwo@juno.com>>; <asa@calvin.edu<mailto:asa@calvin.edu>>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:38 PM
  Subject: RE: What if?

> Burgy you pose the wrong question. Evolution is not on equal footing with
  every scientific theory. In fact, the only scientific theory that would be
  similarly in question would be cosmology. Certainly evolution is not a
  scientific theory as such theories in the experimental sciences, physics,
  chemistry, etc.
>
> Moorad
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu<mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu> on behalf of Either Carol or John
  Burgeson
> Sent: Tue 12/7/2004 1:37 PM
> To: asa@calvin.edu<mailto:asa@calvin.edu>
> Subject: What if?
>
>
>
> What would be the end-product of American public schools if
> we allow every scientific theory to be questioned as evolution is
> questioned??
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2004/12/05/opinion/06purr.html<http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2004/12/05/opinion/06purr.html>
>
> Burgy
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Dec 9 06:43:30 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 09 2004 - 06:43:30 EST