RE: What if?

Evolution is not an experimental science. Is it? It uses science in the same way that forensic science uses experimental science. Evolution deals with unique, historical events--just like cosmology. Where is the nonsense in what I have said. It is your comment that is nonsensical!
 
Moorad

________________________________

From: Michael Roberts [mailto:michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk]
Sent: Tue 12/7/2004 4:15 PM
To: Alexanian, Moorad; Either Carol or John Burgeson; asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: What if?

Nonsense Moorad
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexanian, Moorad" <alexanian@uncw.edu>
To: "Either Carol or John Burgeson" <burgytwo@juno.com>; <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: RE: What if?

> Burgy you pose the wrong question. Evolution is not on equal footing with
every scientific theory. In fact, the only scientific theory that would be
similarly in question would be cosmology. Certainly evolution is not a
scientific theory as such theories in the experimental sciences, physics,
chemistry, etc.
>
> Moorad
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu on behalf of Either Carol or John
Burgeson
> Sent: Tue 12/7/2004 1:37 PM
> To: asa@calvin.edu
> Subject: What if?
>
>
>
> What would be the end-product of American public schools if
> we allow every scientific theory to be questioned as evolution is
> questioned??
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2004/12/05/opinion/06purr.html
>
> Burgy
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Dec 7 17:53:22 2004