Re: The shroud

George Murphy wrote:

> I would be quite happy to believe that the Shroud of Turin is actually the
> burial cloth of Christ, but this webite seems to have ajn ax to grind.
> (Yes, we all do, but the tendency of this one is pretty obvious.)

I did a poor job on the reference. I suggest instead

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/04/0409_040409_TVJesusshroud.html#main

There seems to be some credibility there from a reputable source. Any
comments?

>
>
> Shalom
> George
> http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "wallyshoes" <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
> To: "ASA" <asa@calvin.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 8:26 PM
> Subject: The shroud
>
> > http://www.shroudstory.com/faq-vanillin.htm
> >
> > This was news to me. Can anyone verify?
> >
> > Walt
> >
> >
> > --
> > ===================================
> > Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
> >
> > In any consistent theory, there must
> > exist true but not provable statements.
> > (Godel's Theorem)
> >
> > You can only find the truth with logic
> > If you have already found the truth
> > without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
> > ===================================
> >
> >
> >

--
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================