DW: Overwhelming scientific evidence compels us to conclude the world is much older than 10,000 years.
VJ: If the evidence is indeed as rock-solid as you suggest then why do many reputable scientists continue to think otherwise?
Are there any reputable scientists who beleive that the earth is only 10,000 years old. All the so-called scientists who argue the case do so by misrepresentation etc.
We could start with British YECs for a start e.g, Andy Macintosh who makes woefully inaccurate statements, Edgar Andrews who simply misrepresents geological ideas on age-dating etc etc
As usual
Michael
Received on Mon Jul 26 18:42:55 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 26 2004 - 18:42:56 EDT