On Friday, February 6, 2004, at 10:24 PM, Glenn Morton wrote:
> GRM: I view Genesis 1 as the pre-planning for the universe. The 'and
> it was so" after so many of the verses is not what God said but what
> the Biblical narrator said. By viewing Genesis 1 in this fashion,
> Genesis 2, the supposed second account of creation is really several
> billion years later at the time when mankind was created. Thus,
> the'evidence' supporting YEC, could be merely the wrong conclusion
> coupled with the fact that Theologians seem to never think out of hte
> box.
>
>
I am also attracted to that view, with some caveats. One is that the
creation of man is mentioned in Genesis 1. Maybe the division isn't
between Gen 1 and 2, but somewhere in Gen 1.
Bill Hamilton Rochester, MI 248 652 4148
Received on Sat Feb 7 08:29:34 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Feb 07 2004 - 08:29:34 EST