From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Wed Nov 12 2003 - 20:27:34 EST
In a message dated 11/12/03 6:39:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
drsyme@cablespeed.com writes:
I hope I did this correctly.
Actually when speaking of Rushdoony, Bahnsen, and North, the correct word is
Theonomy. I dont know what Admanson's view is.
Theocracy is literally "rule of god", and Theonomy is literally the "rule of
the law" specifically the Noahic law. So Theonomy is a type of Theocracy;
clearly the Reconstructionists are Theonomists.
I've never heard these terms. Please be patient with me. What you call the
Noahic Law I find in orthodox publications to be called the Noahide laws which
to orthodox Jewish groups are to provide the legal structure for ruling the
gentiles when the temple is re-erected in Jerusalem. Are we talking about the
same thing? Noahic/Noahide?
I don't know Admanson. I wonder about your views on church and state and so I
presented the view of George Soros who showed some remorse for the power he
has wielded lambasted by his fellows.
I would rather appreciate your views on church and state and how it is
possible to build a kingdom of God on earth but only spiritually.
Theonomy is literally "God's Law." Theocracy is literally, "God's rule." I
don't see enough of a difference to spark contention. You may be referring to
a specific movement with which I am unacquainted.
rich faussette
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 12 2003 - 20:28:01 EST