From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. (dfsiemensjr@juno.com)
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:51:48 EDT
Steve,
I went to the site you noted and found a large number of items, too many
for the time available. I opened "Validating Design Discussion
Methodologies" as most likely relevant and found a group trying to
correct an IDer's abuse and misunderstanding of language. I evaluated it
as a nonsense challenge that advanced nothing. Where do I find the ID
research that has forced a reconsideration of "Darwinism"?
Dave
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:11:57 -0500 "Steve Petermann"
<steve@spetermann.org> writes:
>
> Sure. It has forced Darwinists to look a lot work harder at how
> microbiological evolution works. Any challenge to current theory in
> science
> creates an impetus for new creativity. Interestingly enough
> research by
> IDers has also forced them to look harder at Darwinian processes.
>
> For an example of some very professional and civil debates on ID
> and
> Darwinism check out the Brainstorms forum:
>
> http://www.iscid.org/boards/ubb-forum-f-6.html
>
> This is a no nonsense discussion scientific forum on the emergence
> of
> complexity. Amazingly there is none of the usual rhetoric and ad
> hominem
> that has surrounded the debate.
>
>
> Steve Petermann
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:55:00 EDT