From: Richard.Kouchoo@firstdata.com.au
Date: Mon Sep 08 2003 - 01:11:49 EDT
Hello John,
I replied that I will be interested in knowing more about your conceptual
understanding of the development of morality, referring to your earlier email
which read in part:
>>>I can explain the evolutionary process of how our morals/ethics were
developed
out of our ancestors survival needs.<<<
This moral scheme has some nagging, and in fact immoral problems, which seem to
be unresolvable in the absence of an extra-human standard. Exactly how does a
_survival need_ explicate and shed any light on the moral requirements of the
species? Further, if that be the case, how can you distinguish between a
negative moral requirement for species advancement, and a positive one? For
example, you would agree (as most enlightened people do) that intentional
genocide of a 'lesser group popultion' is _immoral_ (a negative). How do you
then account for the survival of the majority populations? Is it not better that
lesser populations die out to make room for the positive _survival needs_ of the
larger populations? Within the _survival needs_ context, specifically, isn't it
better to eliminate the Gypsies so as to leave better resources for the
advancement of the German race?
It's possibly better to include the rest of the list on this thread as I'm sure
they would want to contribute. There may be a few who would disagree with me.
Richard.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Kouchoo/First Data Resources/AU on
08/09/2003 03:12 PM ---------------------------
Richard Kouchoo
08/09/2003 01:47 PM
To: chromatech2@juno.com
cc: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: Is The Bible Reliable Text? (Document link: Richard Kouchoo)
>>>Their 'morality' is often depraved;
women are forced to marry their rapists (Deut. 22: 28, 29), and Jesus
ordered Christian men to hate their fathers, mothers, wives, children,
brothers and sisters (Luke 14: 26). <<<
OK. May be you could expand on this question: How do you _know_ that _hate_ is
an evil?
chromatech2@juno.com@lists.calvin.edu on 08/09/2003 01:30:51 PM
Sent by: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu
To: asa@calvin.edu
cc:
Subject: Is The Bible Reliable Text?
Is the bible truly reliable enough to defend with science?
Did a god inspire ancient writers with knowledge thousands of years ago?
If so, we ignore it at our peril. If not, it will be a treacherous guide,
leading us into dangerous error.
The Bible stories (and religions in general) are a mishmash of history,
morality, theology and claims about the world of nature. Time and
distance have made the historical claims irrelevant; do you know or care
what happened to the Amalekites? Their 'morality' is often depraved;
women are forced to marry their rapists (Deut. 22: 28, 29), and Jesus
ordered Christian men to hate their fathers, mothers, wives, children,
brothers and sisters (Luke 14: 26). The theology is curiously untestable;
miracles, we are told, were everyday occurrences thousands of years ago,
and lots of miracles are promised in the indefinite future, but are we
allowed to study such supernatural events, they remain mere myth and
hearsay.
But what about the natural world? Since the Renaissance four centuries
ago, the growth of science (knowledge based on physical evidence and
reason) has been explosive. This gives us a powerful tool to see whether
or not the ancient writers had access to knowledge unavailable except
through divine revelation. What a harvest of souls for Christ, if the
Bible had correctly predicted the existence of neutrons, the age of the
universe or the size and shape of the planetary orbits! But instead, we
find the biblical authors didn't know what they were talking about:
Geography:
"Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and
shewith him all the kingdoms of the world" Matt. 4: 8. Can any Christian
name a mountain that would show all the kingdoms of the world at that
time, including the kingdom of Kadphises 1 of the Kushans (Afghanistan),
the kingdom of Kutakanna Tissa (Ceylon), and the kingdom of Kuang-wu- Ti
(China)? The writer of this passage assumed that the Earth is flat. Do
you believe it?
"I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth" Rev. 7: 1.
"The world also shall be stable, that it be not moved" 1 Chr. 16: 30. But
the world is not flat, four cornered and motionless; the Bible is wrong.
Belief that the Earth is a globe was a stock charge against heretics
prepared for burning. (1)
Astronomy:
"And the stars of heaven fall unto the earth... And the heaven departed
as a scroll when it is rolled together: Rev. 6: 13, 14. It is not
surprising that ancient cultures thought that the stars were little lamps
hanging from an inverted dome overhead, but we now know that our Milky
Way galaxy alone contains a billion stars that are larger than the Earth,
spread throughout billions of cubic light-years of space. Galileo spent
the last nine years of his life under house arrest, and his student
Giordano Bruno was tortured to death, thanks to the Inquisition's efforts
to stop the spread of ideas we now know to be true.
Biology:
"And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he
is unclean unto you" Lev. 11:6. Hares (rabbits) have a single stomach, so
they cannot make cud, and they don't have hoofs; they have feet which
divide into toes. The Bible also speaks of four-legged birds (Lev.
11:20), unicorns (Is. 34: 7) dragons (Is. 27: 1) and other mythological
creatures.
"The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed... Which indeed
is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among
herbs, and becometh a tree" Matt. 13:31, 32. The mustard seed is not the
least of all seeds; many plants, such as the orchid, have smaller seeds.
How could the Christian god fail to know basic biology?
Evolution:
Fossil evidence, radioactive dating and the study of biology have shown
beyond all doubt that life on Earth has slowly changed over the course of
four billion years. And Darwin's theory of evolution explains how this
happened. Astronomers have also shown that the Universe is many billions
of years old, and we now understand how stars and planets formed in our
galaxy, and are still being formed as interstellar matter follows the
observed laws of nature. It would have been easy for divinely-inspired
writers to have outlined the formation of our Solar System and life on
Earth in a simple, comprehensible fashion. Instead the book of Genesis
makes the preposterous claim that the entire universe was created by
divine fiat in six days.
Medicine:
Science has given us no greater benefit than our control over many of the
loathsome diseases that have plagued humanity. We would expect that a
loving, all-knowing god would have left simple instructions on basic
sanitation and disease prevention that would have immeasurably eased our
suffering. Instead we are given the tedious genealogies of Numbers, the
pointless fantasies of Daniel and Ezekiel, and the meaningless lists of
ritually-clean and unclean animals of Leviticus. No hint is given of the
true cause of diseases. Instead, they are said to come from curses or
from various demons and evil spirits, to be cured by prayer (1 Kings 13:
6), faith (Luke 17: 19) or laying on of hands (Mark 16: 18). Many
Christians now claim that AIDS is God's punishment for homosexuals, which
should come as a surprise to lesbians, who are less likely to get AIDS
than heterosexuals.
Medical advances have been actively opposed by the clergy, as
interference with the ways of a wrathful God. When Ethan Allen, the
Revolutionary War hero was inoculated against smallpox, he was threatened
with persecution for violating a local ordinance against it. (2) That
disease, which horribly disfigured and killed millions of people a year,
has now vanished from the face of the Earth thanks to modern medicine.
According to the World Health Organization, leprosy will be eliminated as
a public health problem in a few years, thanks to the drugs Clofazimine
and Rifampicin. (3) What miseries could have been avoided if Jesus had
done as much! Louis Pasteur and Florence Nightingale did more to benefit
humanity than all the ministers, priests, rabbis, prophets and messiahs
put together.
As science has advanced, religion has retreated. Our ignorant ancestors
of long ago thought that the gods were needed to make the Sun rise and
the rain fall, but science is making the gods unemployed. Those who say
that there is no conflict between science and religion ignore the many
false statements that religions make about the world around us. And if
religion can't be trusted as a guide to nature, it certainly can't be
trusted as a guide to the supernatural.
REFERENCES:
1) The Discoverers by Daniel J. Boorstin, pg. 107 (1983, Random House,
New York, NY)
2) A Sense of History compiled by American Heritage Press Inc., pg. 91
(1985, American Heritage Press Inc., New York NY)
FIRST DATA - CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
===========================================
"All rights reserved. No part of this e-mail or any documents attached may be
reproduced or transmitted, by any form or by any means, without prior written
consent of First Data."
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any
use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail and any file
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please destroy the original transmission (including any attachments) and
immediately notify the sender by telephone at +612 9959 7333 or by reply e-mail.
First Data takes all care to ensure that data transmitted is free from
viruses or other faults/defects but does not represent or warrant that this
communication or any attached file(s) is free from such computer viruses or
other faults or defects. First Data will not be liable to the recipient or any
other person for any loss or damage (including direct, consequential or economic
loss or damage) however caused which may result directly or indirectly
from the receipt or use of this communication or any files attached to
it. It is the responsibility of any person using this communication or
opening any files attached to this communication to implement appropriate
measure to ensure the integrity of their environment
is maintained.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 08 2003 - 01:17:56 EDT