From: Stephen J. Krogh, P.G. (panterragroup@mindspring.com)
Date: Sun Aug 24 2003 - 21:28:25 EDT
No he didn't, you read it wrong.
=========================================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
> Behalf Of Jay Willingham
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 6:37 PM
> To: ASA
> Subject: Re: Student perceptions re evolution
>
>
> Yes, as I thought, Gould treats theory as fact.
>
> If so, to my mind evolution is clearly not a theory but a hypothesis.
>
> Jay
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephen J. Krogh, P.G." <panterragroup@mindspring.com>
> To: <asa@calvin.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 3:23 PM
> Subject: FW: Student perceptions re evolution
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen J. Krogh, P.G. [mailto:panterragroup@mindspring.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 3:39 PM
> > To: Asa-Owner@Lists. Calvin. Edu
> > Subject: RE: Student perceptions re evolution
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu
> [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
> > > Behalf Of Jay Willingham
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:09 AM
> > > To: ASA
> > > Subject: Re: Student perceptions re evolution
> > >
> > >
> > > Excellent idea.
> > >
> > > Here's some ramblings to start off...
> > >
> > > Perhaps there is a fact proof continuum, with proof of absolute
> > > fact at one
> > > end and proof of clear falsehood at the other, with theory and
> > hypothesis
> > > lying in between.
> >
> > Oh my, I see a problem right there. You do realize that this is
> > not how these terms are used in science, right?
> >
> > http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/gould_fact-and-theory.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 24 2003 - 21:30:38 EDT