From: Josh Bembenek (jbembe@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 13 2003 - 10:10:58 EDT
Sarah and Glenn-
Some members of this list are beginning to develop an extraordinarily bad
reading/comprehension problem. Just a while ago I talked about a HYPOTHESIS
and everyone jumped on me for talking about PROOFs. In this example, I
asked a question about what it takes to support a claim that something is
NOT CAUSED by intelligent intervention (because Old Seashells made an
unproven assertion of his personal faith stance on the subject), and
everyone responds back about whatever it might take to make the claim that
something IS CAUSED by intelligent intervention. I can discuss the veracity
of a negative claim without having to prove the inverse. If you read again
what I wrote, I never stated that any feature of shells, fibonacci patterns,
or anything else is the product of ID in that post. If you had been
previously attentive to the conversations you would have seen the following:
http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200308/0109.html
Confused,
Josh
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 13 2003 - 10:11:12 EDT