Re: specified complexity (was: The Aphenomenon of Abiogenesis)

From: bivalve (bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com)
Date: Thu Aug 07 2003 - 11:08:41 EDT

  • Next message: sheila-mcginty@geotec.net: "Re: Sin?"

    >> Complexity is related inversely to probability. Highly complex objects have a low probability of being actualized naturally.<<

    This is also a peculiar definition. Perhaps the standard idea of complexity (having lots of parts) is assumed, but highly complex structures can readily be actualized naturally. For example, naturally occurring polymers are quite complex, yet clearly formed naturally (regardless of whether ID advocates are right in claiming that the instructions to produce some of them were not formed naturally). "Specified complexity" is supposed to solve this problem, but the biochemical systems popular with ID cannot be shown to have appropriate "specificity" with current knowledge.

        Dr. David Campbell
        Old Seashells
        University of Alabama
        Biodiversity & Systematics
        Dept. Biological Sciences
        Box 870345
        Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0345 USA
        bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com

    That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at Droitgate Spa

                     



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 11:00:33 EDT