Re: One Simple Question

From: richard@biblewheel.com
Date: Mon Aug 04 2003 - 22:09:06 EDT

  • Next message: richard@biblewheel.com: "Re: Information Theory 101 and the Error in Glen's Test"

    Glen wrote:

    > Hi Richard, you asked
    >
    > >-----Original Message-----
    > >From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
    > >Behalf Of richard@biblewheel.com
    > >Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 7:37 PM
    > >To: asa@calvin.edu
    > >Subject: One Simple Question
    > >
    > >
    > >In post http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200307/0650.html Glen
    > >responded to
    > >my question
    > >
    > >>Also, my point was that if we do live in an
    > >>ID universe, which you admit to be possible,
    > >>then it would seem that ID science would be
    > >>*necessary* to correctly understand our
    > >>universe. Is this correct?
    > >
    >
    > To have a correct understanding, yes, to be able to prove or demonstrate
    it
    > unequivocally, no. as with math, there are true statements which can't be
    > proven true.
    >
    >
    >

    OK - this is getting close. We agree that we need ID science for a correct
    understanding. Now there are two questions

    1) What is the correct design of this ID Science?
    2) How do you support your assertion that proof would be impossible?

    Richard Amiel McGough
    Discover the sevenfold symmetric perfection of the Holy Bible at
    http://www.BibleWheel.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 22:07:52 EDT