Re: YEC and interpretations (was: Re: asa-digest V1 #3214)

From: Bill Payne (bpayne15@juno.com)
Date: Thu Mar 27 2003 - 21:58:41 EST

  • Next message: Darryl Maddox: "Re: leaving"

    The last sentence I wrote this morning needs clarification. In the YEC
    model with everything being created in six days, and death beginning
    after the Fall, the Burgess shale fossils, and all other fossils, are
    reckoned to be post-Fall. Therefore, if fossiliferous units exist below
    the Alberta reefs, and if those underlying units are considered to be
    Flood deposits, then the overlying reefs must either be Flood deposits,
    or, if they are pre-Flood overlying Flood deposits, then the reef rocks
    must have been thrust over the Flood deposits after the Flood.

    Hope that helps.

    Bill

    On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 07:16:23 -0600 Bill Payne <bpayne15@juno.com> writes:
    Of course, a little thrust fault could have shoved the pre-Flood
    "Ordovician" reef rocks over the more recent "Cambrian" Flood deposits.

    ________________________________________________________________
    Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
    Only $9.95 per month!
    Visit www.juno.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 27 2003 - 22:16:27 EST