Re: Johnson on Bible Answer Man

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 10:09:48 EST

  • Next message: Alexanian, Moorad: "RE: Johnson on Bible Answer Man"

    Jim Armstrong wrote:
    >
    > Of course PJ is a Professor or Law, not a scientist. His arguments flow
    > from a specific agenda and seem more those of the courtroom, using facts
    > in selective ways in order to create doubt. I think that is evident in
    > what he calls his "Wedge strategy". He describes his agenda pretty well at
    > http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_wedgeprogress041601.htm
    > I presume this is discussed as well in his recent book "Wedge of Truth".

            To the statement that "PJ is a Professor or Law, not a scientist" should be
    added "nor a theologian."
            His comments about Kenneth Miller can be seen as the familiar lawyer's tactic of
    discrediting a witness.
                                                    George

    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 10:10:12 EST