From: Jim Armstrong (jarmstro@qwest.net)
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:50:45 EST
Of course PJ is a Professor or Law, not a scientist. His arguments flow
from a specific agenda and seem more those of the courtroom, using facts
in selective ways in order to create doubt. I think that is evident in
what he calls his "Wedge strategy". He describes his agenda pretty well at
http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_wedgeprogress041601.htm
I presume this is discussed as well in his recent book "Wedge of Truth".
Dawsonzhu@aol.com wrote:
> Jim Armstrong wrote:
>
>> From PJ's own web site it looks like the latest on the subject is 1995
>> http://www.id.ucsb.edu/fscf/library/johnson/
>
>
>
> Even more disturbing is that PJ seems to know Kenneth Miller
> fairly well as he debated him in 1996. Why he would basically
> call him something just short of a seditionist is beyond me.
> (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/odyssey/debate/index.html).
> [PJs comments on Ken were the original reason for this post.]
>
> by Grace along indeed, we proceed,
> Wayne
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:54:04 EST