Re: ID science

From: Jan de Koning (jan@dekoning.ca)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 10:04:04 EST

Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Ruse's Science Article"

Previous message: Dick Fischer: "Re: ID science"
In reply to: John Burgeson: "ID science"
Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: ID science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 04:14 PM 13/03/2003 -0700, John Burgeson wrote:
>On whether ID is potentially good science -- or not.

My main objection to the ID movement is, that it appears that we,
creatures, are deciding what is intelligent, and what is not. After all
"intelligence" is a creature made by God. Can we ask of something we make
to tell us if we did it "intelligently" or "stupidly"?

Jan de Koning

Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Ruse's Science Article"
Previous message: Dick Fischer: "Re: ID science"
In reply to: John Burgeson: "ID science"
Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: ID science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 14 2003 - 09:59:39 EST