From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 18:33:45 EST
In a message dated 1/20/03 6:15:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
JLR173rdNY@aol.com writes:
> However, if the statement is correct, that does that say that my friends
> who, after they found out that they could not have children, adopted one
> little girl taken from her family for abuse - and then took her sister as
> well to keep the girls together - have no purpose in life since as a couple
>
If your friends could not have children, that's God's will isn't it? I didn't
say that people who don't reproduce have no purpose. I said that as
homosexual behavior becomes preferred in a population to heterosexual
behavior, the population drops. Haven't you noticed?
There is no scientific proof that homosexuality is innate. NONE. If you can
find some, please present it. I would like to present it to a few of my
colleagues in the Human Behavior and Evolution Society. They're scientists.
They don't care about defending Christianity and they don't know of any. I've
asked because it is a salient point, but you can't make the point until
there's proof.
rich
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 20 2003 - 18:34:09 EST