Never, in my wildest dreams, did I imagine that I'd be "taking George's
side" in a history discussion with Dick.
BUT, if I'm fairly close to correct, George is saying that the theology
is "above" the history.
And, I'd have to agree with that 100%. So, let's talk theology. Is
there any theological reason why Adam must be chronological human #1?
If not, that's one more nail in AiG's coffin. (I don't really take
the ICR seriously any more).
Jim Eisele
Genesis in Question
http://genesisinquestion.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 27 2002 - 15:54:10 EDT