RE: sciDocument.rtf

From: Lucy Lear (lucylear@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 05 2002 - 18:22:56 EDT

  • Next message: Shuan Rose: "RE: Daniel"

    Jim, your god is too small.

    If B below is true, and there are any errors in the Bible, then your god is
    inept.

    If C is true, then we all should just stand up, turn off our minds, and
    salute Pat Robertson.

    Lucy the Lurker

    >From: "Jim Eisele" <jeisele@starpower.net>
    >To: <shuanr@boo.net>
    >CC: <glenn.morton@btinternet.com>, <asa@calvin.edu>
    >Subject: RE: sciDocument.rtf
    >Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 17:00:07 -0000
    >
    >Shuan writes
    >
    > >I'd still like some comments on the rest of my post , which
    > >involve more substantive issues.
    >
    >Shuan, please stop trying to relegate the Bible to a human
    >document. I haven't seen you acknowledge ANY responses as
    >explanations to why you are criticizing a straw man.
    >
    >You have a "modern lens" that is ignoring what the Bible
    >authors were trying to say. Let me suggest a proper order for
    >you:
    >
    >A) God is almighty (you said that yourself)
    >B) Biblical errors reflect on God.
    >C) You may not like this. People who go around demanding
    > explanations for Biblical "errors" are not building anybody
    > up. It would be really nice if we focused on Biblical
    > accuracies!
    >
    >Jim

    _________________________________________________________________
    Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 05 2002 - 18:58:07 EDT