A few more or less impartial observations:
--- Jim Eisele <jeisele@starpower.net> wrote:
> Walt writes
> >Jim has aproblem. That is clear.
> >Now, I agree that Jim is generally obnoxious -- but
> he seems to indicate
> >that he has a personal problem (BIG TIME!)
> A) Grow up
I know many fourth graders who use the term "pansy",
not too many adults.
> B) When did you become my judge?
Probably, when you called whomever "pansies" -- seems
like a "throwing the first stone" judgmental thing to
me.
> C) Judge not, lest you be judged.
Since when is "pansy" a non-judgmental, value neutral
term?
> D) How constructive.
Please explain how pansy is a constructive term.
> E) How would you feel if someone wrote that about
> you?
"Pansy" or some other ad hominem epithet?
> F) Ever bother to ask why I get so irritated - see
> A)
Turn the other cheek?
> G) Although you made some "softening remarks" - see
> A)
Even if you think the other person a fool, as the old
saying goes, "He who argues with a fool is a fool."
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 22 2002 - 22:42:34 EDT