Jim,
You wrote: I agree that the creative acts were very similar in content. But,
let's give Paul his due. What Paul is saying in no way contradicts science.
From you just wrote it seems as if I may have misunderstood Paul. I just
looked for his original post and it looks like it has disappeared into
cyberspace. I was under the impression that he was saying because the author
of Gen. 5:1, 2 combined the "Adam" of Gen. 1:26, 27 with the "Adam" of Gen.
chapters 2 and 3 that he was saying that the Adam of Gen. 1:26,27 had to be
the "Adam" of "Adam and Eve." Are you telling me he was saying something
different? If so, what was it? As I said, I've now lost his post.
I'll be sure to read posts more carefully before responding to them again.
Sorry.
Thanks.
Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 18 2002 - 18:28:52 EDT