Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)

From: John (Burgy) Burgeson (hoss_radbourne@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 15:54:35 EST

  • Next message: Jonathan Clarke: "Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)"

    I cannot believe that the Peacocks are unaware of ICR et. al.

    Burgy

    >From: "Robert Schneider" <rjschn39@bellsouth.net>
    >To: "Asa" <asa@calvin.edu>
    >Subject: Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)
    >Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:20:58 -0500
    >
    >Re: British School Inspectors
    >
    >Those of us who attended the Templeton Foundation Science and Religion
    >Course Workshop at MIT in the summer of 1998 heard a presentation by
    >Rosemary Peacocke, Arthur Peacocke's wife, on teaching religion in UK
    >schools. Rosemary is one of the Queen's Inspectors of Schools. She might
    >be in a position, especially with the support of her husband, to act on
    >this issue if she (and Arthur) were to be given information about the
    >creationist movement in the US, particularly the Morris-Ham axis and their
    >activities. I think I can get ahold of Arthur's email address, if anyone
    >should like to follow up on this.
    >
    >Bob Schneider
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Michael Roberts
    > To: Shuan Rose ; Asa
    > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:00 AM
    > Subject: Re: Creationism in the UK (Utley v Dawkins)
    >
    >
    > The trouble is that the British Press does not understand the issues
    >about Creationism and think it is all about Ussher and not Morris and
    >Price. As a result much what they write is muddled ( despite letters from
    >well-infromed people which dont get published!)
    >

    _________________________________________________________________
    Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 15:55:01 EST