Re: The "global flood" - was a lot of other things previously

• Previous message: Jonathan Clarke: "Re: BIBLE: Genesis tablets"
• In reply to: Jim Eisele: "The "global flood" - was a lot of other things previously"
• Next in thread: Jim Eisele: "Re: The "global flood" - was a lot of other things previously"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim wrote:

>On his Mar 18 post, Dick Fischer describes "the flood"
>
> >The overflowing Euphrates river from Spring rain
>
>Dick, I must take exception to this. If this is
>"all the flood was" then how do you explain the ark?

As a boatload of local animals indigenous to southern Mesopotamia. No
lemurs from Madagascar. No marsupials from Australia. No penguins from
Antarctica or polar bears from the Arctic region. No monkeys from Africa
or South America. No elephants from Africa or India. No alligators from
Florida. And no dodos from the Institute for Creation Research.

Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orisol.com
"The answer we should have known about 150 years ago"

• Next message: Jim Eisele: "Re: The "global flood" - was a lot of other things previously"
• Previous message: Jonathan Clarke: "Re: BIBLE: Genesis tablets"
• In reply to: Jim Eisele: "The "global flood" - was a lot of other things previously"
• Next in thread: Jim Eisele: "Re: The "global flood" - was a lot of other things previously"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 21 2002 - 16:19:19 EST