>From: "Don Perrett" <don.perrett@verizon.net>
>
> While I would agree that there is no direct scientific text within the
> Bible, anything which we discover now should, at the very least, not
> contradict the Bible.
This is a familiar assertion. But what are its underlying assumptions? Why
should anyone expect that the biblical text, written 2 or 3 millennia ago,
would be consistent with all discoveries made since that time? Are these
underlying assumptions and expectations warranted, or do they deserve to be
candidly reexamined?
Howard Van Till
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 14 2002 - 12:04:55 EST