Jan de Koning wrote:
>
>
> Not only that they have been expressed for years. I read many books about
> Creationism for and against.. I am not going all over the Internet to find
> out if it is exactly the same as I studied 14 years ago. My reply may be
> found in the Acts of Synod of the Christian Reformed Church 19911, pages
> 367 to 413. I don't blame you either if you don't read it, but don't
> expect that I repeat everything from more than 10 years ago. This subject
> comes up time and again. The only thing I want to say: Do not expect us
> to repeat our arguments over and over again. Especially since I have said
> the last few months time and again that the reading is not only about Gen.
> 1, not even Gen. 1-11 but more generally: How do you read? and then if you
> do not want to go back to basics, meaning studying the philosophy behind
> the way you read, no amount of argueing will help, as it already shows.
>
> And I repeat: if you believe that Jesus Christ died for you too on the
> cross, I stop talking, since from the few exchanges we had there is no end
> in sight. So read our report.
I give up Jan. I can't even follow what we are talking about. To let it
die is best.
I'll try to respond to your other post. I think it is a nice idea to
know the background of each other. Too bad it is not more frequent --
especially as new people join the list.
Walt
>
> Jan de K.
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com> In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 12 2002 - 20:27:02 EST