Paul & Peter, you are both very intelligent. I have learned from both of
you.
But, I had something to do with the beginning of this discussion, back on
Feb 14.
To be honest, I am shocked that we are still talking about this (in, and of
itself, that is not a problem).
Paul: Please, please, please limit your criticisms of the prophetic
narrative view to one at a time. I printed out the most recent version of
your "debate" with Peter. It was onto the sixth page!
Peter: You've done incredible work. Your work deserves to be criticized
one point at time.
I can't speak for everyone else. Sadly, this is what I got out of the six
pages:
Peter: "But this is a straw man."
Paul: "As you admit, there is no evidence that the ocean of 4.4 Ga was a
global ocean."
In an ideal world, we could restart the debate at this point. Let the
debate about the global ocean go on for 3 months, for all I care. I'd
rather learn a lot about the evidence for a global ocean than try to follow
several different points at once.
Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 01 2002 - 16:16:40 EST