RE: Human origins and doctrine (was Definition of "Species")

From: Adrian Teo (ateo@whitworth.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 25 2002 - 11:34:14 EST

  • Next message: Adrian Teo: "RE: Human origins and doctrine (was Definition of "Species")"

    Hello Burgy,

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: John W Burgeson [mailto:burgytwo@juno.com]
    > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:25 PM
    > To: ateo@whitworth.edu
    > Cc: asa@calvin.edu
    > Subject: Re: Human origins and doctrine (was Definition of "Species")
    >
    >
    > Adrian wrote: "I fail to see how the doctrine of original sin can be
    > reconciled with
    > a purely evolutionary framework that denies the special creation of
    > humans."
    >
    > Then maybe the "doctrine of original sin" is what needs to be
    > challenged?

    Perhaps so. However, one may be tempted to take this line of reasoning and
    argue that maybe ANY fundamental doctrines of the faith should also be
    challenged including the Trinity, Christ as man-God, sola Scriptura, etc.
    Where do we draw the line?



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 25 2002 - 11:34:51 EST