I do not know of anyone who can prove that his/her experience can prove, in
the mathematical sense, the existence of a world out there. We assume it and
proceed to do experiments, etc. I am sure birds cannot prove the existence of
air, gravity, etc. either yet they fly. Moorad
>===== Original Message From Michael Roberts <topper@robertschirk.u-net.com>
=====
>Excellent point Moorad has argued himself into a position of total
>scepticism.
>
>Michael
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Glenn Morton" <glenn.morton@btinternet.com>
>To: <alexanian@uncwil.edu>
>Cc: "Asa@Calvin. Edu" <asa@calvin.edu>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 4:50 AM
>Subject: RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB
>
>
>> Hi Moorad,
>>
>> One question and one statement.
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Moorad Alexanian<alexanian@uncwil.edu>
>> >[mailto:alexanian@uncwil.edu]
>> >Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:11 PM
>> >To: george murphy; Glenn Morton
>> >Cc: Asa@Calvin. Edu
>> >Subject: RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB
>> I do not have to prove that there is a universe out
>> >there that our
>> >sense and physical devices detect. I assume it! I do not dispute your
>> >assumptions to study nature, but one can never be conclusive about
>> >what really
>> >happened.
>>
>> Does this include the possibility that we can never be sure that the
>> resurrection occurred?
>>
>>
>> Your forensic study of the past is fine but it can never
>> >lead to a
>> >certainty, the best it can be is to be true beyond a reasonable doubt.>
>>
>> The resurrection occurred in the past and can only be studied today
>> forensically!
>>
>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 20:31:41 EST