Re: Pasteur and nature of science

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. (dfsiemensjr@juno.com)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 13:59:29 EST

  • Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: views of scientists-help needed"

    On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:49:58 -0600 Bill Payne <bpayne15@juno.com> writes:
    in small part
    >
    > Without the concept of "molecules to man" (increasing complexity),
    > you
    > cut the heart out of the theory.
    >
    > Bill
    > ________________________________________________________________

    By adding this you cut out Sacculina and all of the tapeworms, as well as
    the fact that bacteria continue to exist. This, too, is proof by crooked
    definition.
    Dave

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 14:04:04 EST