Re: Staged developmental creation.

From: Howard J. Van Till (hvantill@novagate.com)
Date: Wed Nov 14 2001 - 13:31:21 EST

  • Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Staged developmental creation."

    From: RDehaan237@aol.com

    In a message dated 11/10/01 10:06:48 AM, hvantill@novagate.com writes:

    << OK, thanks for the effort. Let's follow up on that. Suppose that God were
    to add a "new formational capability" to the Creation today at 1 p.m. Would
    atoms, or molecules, or cells then be able to do things after 1 p.m. that
    they were not able to do before? Would the observable/measurable properties
    or behavior patterns of atoms, molecules, or cells be observed to change at
    1 p.m.? Is this how new, more complex structures/systems arise? >>

    Howard, In your question you used an example that is so far afield from my
    view of
    how God works that I can hardly respond to it. The idea of God adding new
    informational capability to the creation at "1 pm today" *for no apparent
    reason* does not fit in any way into my way of thinking. It makes me wonder
    if you really understand or accept what I wrote about staged development of
    creation.

    Bob, your addition of the words *for no apparent reason* introduces an
    element that is completely foreign to what I actually said. In no way did I
    suggest "no apparent reason" for God's action. I am just trying to find out
    what you envision as the action that God performs when you say God
    introduces a "new formational capability."

    God does not act capriciously.

    Once again your addition of "capriciously" completely changes what I
    actually said.

     As I wrote before, his adding new
    informational capability occurred during transitions between stages of
    creational development. Doing so is part of the plan of creation, not a
    spur
    of the moment decision, or an emergency response to some failure or
    inadequacy of creation.

    Once again, Bob, I'm not interested in dealing with the issue of "for no
    apparent reason," or "capriciously," or "spur of the moment," or "emergency
    response." Every one of those terms is totally irrelevant to the actual
    question that I raised. My concern with both Peter's proposal re "hidden
    options" and your proposal re "staged developmental creation" is to get a
    clearer picture of what kind of divine action you have in mind.

    So let's take your 1-PM-today scenario (give or take a few millions of
    years) and place it sometime between the cooling of the earth and the
    appearance of the first living cell, roughly 3.8 billion years ago. Then
    the
    answer to your question is, yes, atoms, or molecules, or cells would then be
    able to do things that they were not able to do before. C, H, O, N atoms
    along with others, were able to do something new, .....

    Bob, any suggestions as to what actually was modified? Were the rules of
    quantum mechanics changes? Were the values of one or more of the fundamental
    constants changed? Were the natures of interaction forces modified? Was the
    nature of space changed? Any one of these modifications would indeed alter
    the formational capabilities of atoms, molecules and cells.

    As a theistic IDer, I hold that the first biological cell was irreducibly
    complex, intelligently designed, and formed by as yet unknown means that
    include the addition of new formational capabilities by divine action.

    Yes, I understand that. I'm just trying to understand how these general
    commitments translate into a specific vision of what sort of divine action
    was performed.

    Howard



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2001 - 13:49:12 EST