Runge also wrote: "The only way that we can reason correctly (or in
absolute logic) about our fallen state of reason is by the gift of the
Spirit of truth."
And one person, depending on the Spirit, says X; another says Y. Both
cannot be right. X and Y may be any two
conflicting claims. Eternal security, biblical inerrancy, earth's age,
whether tomatoes are a poison or not.
I had a friend who argued from that position that the book of Mormon was
inspired.
As I see it, one must be either a skeptic or a credulous fool. If one
chooses
the second of these, one has so many possible "fool" positions to choose
among.
Jon also wrote: "A neglected symmetry for counting in real and imaginary
ways (and in positive and negative directions) means that this world's
mathematical logic is incomplete, and ambiguous. This is a key point,...
."
It may be a key point. It is also incoherent. It uses English words but
not all combinations
of English words convey meaning. These, for instance, look as if they
should but, in fact,
they do not.
Burgy (John Burgeson)
www.Burgy.50megs.com
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 09 2001 - 15:22:14 EST