Dembski clarification from Baylor

From: glenn morton (glenn.morton@btinternet.com)
Date: Tue Oct 31 2000 - 16:30:51 EST

  • Next message: Bryan R. Cross: "Re: Dembski clarification from Baylor"

    It is interesting that Baylor is saying the same thing that I am
    saying--that Dembski was not the victim of persecution and thus was not a
    martyr to the evil evolutionists. I am sure that there are some here who
    still won't believe this, but Dembski simply isn't a martyr in spite of the
    fact that he is about to be turned into one. Any response, Bryan?

    This was on metanews:

    http://listserv.omni-list.com/scripts/wa.exe?S2=metanews&L=metanews&q=beaty&
    s=&f=&a=&b=

    Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:43:44 -0400
     Reply-To: "Michael D. Beaty" <Bruce_Gordon@BAYLOR.EDU>
     Sender: Metanews <metanews@META-LIST.ORG>
     From: "Michael D. Beaty" <Bruce_Gordon@BAYLOR.EDU>
     Subject: Baylor University Responds to Misconceptions about the
    Polanyi
                   Center Controversy

     In light of remarks on the META list that indicate a significant
     misunderstanding of the recent events surrounding the Polanyi Center at
     Baylor University, most particularly the removal of Dr. Dembski as its
     director, I think it is important to clarify the significance of what has
     happened.

     Dr. Dembski was not removed from the directorship for any academic failure.
     Baylor recognizes the value and legitimacy of his academic work, as did the
     External Review Committee. Baylor fully supports his academic freedom to
     pursue his research and hopes that he will continue to do so. Dr. Dembski
     was removed from his post as director on administrative grounds. In order
    to
     function in his administrative capacity, it was necessary that Dr. Dembski
     be able to work well with other Baylor faculty, first and foremost an
     advisory committee. It was the judgment of the administration that some of
     his recent actions severely compromised his ability to perform his central
     administrative duties. It was for this reason, and this reason alone, that
     he was removed from his directorial post.

     There also has been a suggestion that the removal of Dr. Dembski as
    director
     is a sign that Baylor has succumbed to political pressure to squelch work
    on
     intelligent design. Nothing could be further from the truth. Having been
     freed from administrative tasks, Dr. Dembski will be able to devote himself
     exclusively to research, which arguably is the most valuable contribution
    he
     can make to design theory.

     Finally, some have claimed that this sad episode suggests that Baylor is
     weakening its commitment to being a Christian university. Baylor University
     remains committed to encouraging a faithful intellect and an intellectually
     responsible faith.

     Michael Beaty
     Director, The Baylor Institute for Faith and Learning

    glenn

    see http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
    for lots of creation/evolution information



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 16:30:12 EST