Bob DeHaan wrote recently:
"The question is, will our complete understanding of natural
events be found in science. I hold to a provisional no. I hold that there
are phenomena that can be identified or inferred by scientific means of
observation and logic, whose complete explanation tails out beyond science,
and requires theological of philosophical explanation. "
Sometimes, Bob, you put the issue in words even the simplist of us can
understand!
Obviously, I stand in agreement. I do not identify myself, however, as
an "IDer," for I see much danger in their current approaches, particularly
PJ's rather absolute confaltion of methodological naturalism with
philosophical naturalism. That Dawkins, Gouldm Sagan and others also
evidence this error is obvious; I think the ID movement does not have to do
so.
Appreciate reading your comments and often am in agreement!
Burgy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 18:47:26 EDT