Re: The First Ice Age

From: Howard J. Van Till (hvantill@novagate.com)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 08:38:16 EST

  • Next message: George Andrews: "Re: "Genesis Reconsidered""

    "Coincidence?" Adam asks. Or, is it concordism at its best? Case
    dismissed.

    Howard

    ----------
    From: "Adam" <adam@crowl.webcentral.com.au>
    To: <asa@calvin.edu>
    Subject: The First Ice Age
    Date: Fri, Mar 3, 2000, 3:39 AM

    Hi ASA

    The following link covers work by James Kasting on the Earth's earliest
    atmosphere...

    http://www.psu.edu/ur/NEWS/news/snowballearth.html

    According to his figures 0.01% of the current levels of atmospheric oxygen
    would have oxidised methane in the early atmosphere. This caused a large
    cooling episode for the Earth because the continents of the time were around
    the equator and a reduction in the greenhouse effect caused by the methane
    meant large sea-ice caps formed. These spread unhindered to the equator and
    froze the Earth. A similar sequence of events occurred perhaps four times
    between 750 - 570 million years ago.

    The relevance? Well many concordist scenarios require obscuration of the
    heavens to explain day/night prior to sun/moon in Genesis, but a layer of
    continuous cloud cover is unlikely to have persisted for billions of years.
    Methane in the upper atmosphere however would've been UV processed into a
    layer of "smog" similar to that which covers Saturn's moon Titan, and this
    would've done the job. Its demise is correlated to the appearance of
    continents collected at the equator and life arising on land almost exactly
    the sequence recorded in Genesis...

    coincidence?

    Adam



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 03 2000 - 08:40:29 EST