Re: What are most convincing anti-Christian tracts?

From: glenn morton (mortongr@flash.net)
Date: Wed Mar 01 2000 - 13:41:29 EST

  • Next message: glenn morton: "Re: Living with the liabilities"

    At 10:15 AM 3/1/00 -0500, Joel Cannon wrote:
    >Hello all:
    >
    >Ted Davis's comments about Andrew Dickson White's book brings up what
    >I find to be an interesting question concerning anti-Christian writing.
    >
    >What books, articles tracts against Christianity do the people on the
    >list find to be most convincing? This need not, of course, involve
    >science (and in my opinion won't).
    >
    > We might add a second question asking what tracts are most effective
    >because like advertising, religious arguments can be effective while
    >having flawed logic or bad premises (which are accepted by the general
    >audience). White was apparently quite effective but maybe less
    >convincing to someone familiar with the data.

    Be that as it may, I first ran into Cosmas via WHite. I got Cosmas' book
    and behold, what White said Cosmas said turned out to be true. What is one
    to do with that?
    glenn

    Foundation, Fall and Flood
    Adam, Apes and Anthropology
    http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm

    Lots of information on creation/evolution



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 01 2000 - 19:37:28 EST