>>THe thing that disappoints me is that all this effort Christians have
put
into ID reaps such a small harvest. The removal of the Bible from the
origins discussion and the fact that, with their strategy, they can't
even
show that the Christian God is the Designer. It might be aliens or even
the Roman gods might be the designer.>>
Seems to me that this argument, along with others on this LISTSERV, puts
the ID people in a tough place.
If they claim that the ID concept is "supernaturally neutral," as I
believe they do in most, if not all, of their writings, then Glenn and
George (and others) castigate them for "leaving the Bible out." If they
do not so claim, then they are chastised for being "just another
creationist group."
I agree with Moorad in this instance. I think the ID movement should
stand on its own as a scientific/philosophical concept. Johnson is right
-- leave the Bible out of it.
Aside to Glenn -- just read your son's testimony & the A&M story. Great
story! Blessings.
Burgy
___________________________________________________________________
Why pay more to get Web access?
Try Juno for FREE -- then it's just $9.95/month if you act NOW!
Get your free software today: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.